Within the Identify of Artwork, an Artist Pockets $83,000 and Creates Nothing | Latest News Table

Within the Identify of Artwork, an Artist Pockets $83,000 and Creates Nothing

​The title of the art work was a clue to the artist’s intentions — “Take the Cash and Run.”

A Danish museum gave about $83,000 to an artist to breed a pair of works displaying the money, reflecting the character of labor within the fashionable world.

As a substitute the artist, Jens Haaning, delivered two clean canvases and not using a scrap of forex in sight, that are featured within the exhibition that opened final week on the Kunsten Museum of Fashionable Artwork. Mr. Haaning concedes that he did nearly no precise work on the mission after receiving a fee from the museum, within the northern metropolis of Aalborg, however says he’s protecting the money — within the title of artwork, in fact.

“That is solely a bit of artwork if I don’t return the cash,” Mr. Haaning mentioned in an interview. “I imagine that I’ve created a very good and related piece of art work, which may very well be held on the wall.”

The response from the Kunsten Museum has been blended — at the least publicly.

Inventive deserves apart, Mr. Haaning didn’t fulfill his unique fee, Lasse Andersson, the museum’s director, mentioned in an interview. He mentioned the artist was given 532,549 Danish kroner to breed two of his earlier works, through which he had framed piles of kroner and euro payments to characterize annual wages earned by staff in Austria and Denmark.

Due to this fact, the museum expects Mr. Haaning — whose precise fee fee had been set at 10,000 kroner, lower than $1,600, plus bills — to return the cash that was speculated to be contained within the artworks after the exhibit closes in January, Mr. Andersson mentioned. In any other case, he added, he’s ready to take authorized motion.

However for now, the museum is taking part in alongside. Mr. Andersson mentioned that Mr. Haaning’s stunt was within the spirit of the fee, which was to immediate reflections on how and why folks labor for cash.

“The work is attention-grabbing to me,” Mr. Andersson mentioned. “It’s partly a humorous remark: why can we work, what’s satisfying about being good at one thing?”

The episode, Mr. Andersson mentioned, echoed the story of Robin Hood: “The good Jens Haaning cheats the larger museum director — it’s a story that can also be humorous.”

However a few of his colleagues weren’t as enthusiastic, in response to one other artist within the exhibition, John Korner, who was on the museum when Mr. Haaning’s work was delivered.

“The curators had been clearly upset,” he mentioned. “I have no idea what they anticipated. They really requested me what I assumed, maybe as a result of I used to be the one artist on the museum on the time.”

Mr. Haaning’s newest creation has not stunned these conversant in his work.

“He’s the final word trickster,” mentioned Merete Jankowski, an artwork historian and former employer and collaborator of Mr. Haaning.

The stunt mirrored a few of his earlier performances, she mentioned, which are sometimes meant as provocations to upset “our notion of what’s truthful and simply in our society, particularly in the case of marginalized communities.”

Ms. Jankowski pointed to a very political piece from 1995 referred to as “Weapon Manufacturing,” through which the artist invited a gaggle of younger immigrants to the exhibition house to take part in a workshop for making avenue weapons.

“It’s a method to create an art work for a museum, which he has performed many occasions earlier than, and I feel that has been ignored,” she mentioned referring to his newest mission. “Attempt to do a Google seek for Jens Haaning and see what he has performed earlier than — how can this be a shock?”

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: