Judges order Tommy Robinson to pay Jamal Hijazi 100,000 kilos ($138,000) after ruling he libelled the Syrian schoolboy.
Judges ordered British far-right figurehead Tommy Robinson to pay 100,000 kilos ($138,000) to a Syrian schoolboy after ruling on Thursday that he had libelled the kid.
Jamal Hijazi, 18, was attacked within the playground at Almondbury Group College in Huddersfield, northern England, in October 2018.
Shortly after the video of the incident went viral, Robinson, whose actual title is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, claimed in two Fb movies that Hijazi was himself a perpetrator of violence who “assaults younger English ladies in his faculty”.
Within the clips, considered by almost one million folks, 38-year-old Robinson additionally claimed Hijazi “beat a lady black and blue” and “threatened to stab” one other boy at his faculty. The allegations had been rejected by the courtroom on Thursday.
Robinson, who represented himself, maintained his feedback had been broadly true, saying he had “uncovered dozens of accounts of aggressive, abusive and deceitful behaviour” by Hijazi.
However Excessive Courtroom choose Matthew Nicklin stated Robinson had did not show his allegations and dominated in Hijazi’s favour, granting him 100,000 kilos ($137,000) in damages, in addition to ordering Robinson to pay prices which the PA information company understands to be greater than 500,000 kilos ($689,000).
Catrin Evans, Hijazi’s lawyer, stated the feedback led to her shopper receiving loss of life threats.
Nicklin stated, “The defendant took on the burden of proving his allegations to be true. He has failed. In actuality, and for the explanations I’ve defined, his proof fell woefully quick. He has, nevertheless, continued with the intense allegations he initially made, and has even added to them throughout the proceedings.”
“The claimant has needed to face them within the full glare and publicity of a Excessive Courtroom trial. It’s my accountability to clarify that the defendant has failed in his defence of reality, to vindicate the claimant and to award him a sum in damages that represents honest compensation.”
One other member of Hijazi’s authorized crew welcomed the choice as a vindication.
“It took nice braveness for our shopper, Jamal Hijazi, to pursue his libel motion in opposition to such a outstanding far-right and anti-Islam activist as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon,” stated Francesca Flood.
“Jamal and his household now want to put this matter behind them so that they will get on with their lives. They do, nevertheless, want to prolong their gratitude to the nice British public for his or her help and generosity, with out which this authorized motion wouldn’t have been doable,” she added.
Nicklin stated Hijazi suffered “significantly extreme” penalties from the movies.
“The defendant’s allegations in opposition to the claimant had been very severe and had been revealed extensively,” he stated.